{"id":44246,"date":"2013-03-18T16:58:00","date_gmt":"2013-03-18T18:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/escaesco.com.br\/lab\/anba\/trade-balance-back-to-deficit-2\/"},"modified":"2024-02-21T22:21:42","modified_gmt":"2024-02-22T01:21:42","slug":"trade-balance-back-to-deficit-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/trade-balance-back-to-deficit-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Trade balance back to deficit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bras\u00edlia \u2013 After starting the month on a positive note, Brazil\u2019s trade balance has posted a deficit in the third week of March. According to figures released this Monday (18th) by the Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade, the deficit stood at US$ 448 million, as against US$ 61 million and US$ 175 million surpluses in the first and second week of the month, respectively. <\/p>\n<p> Last week\u2019s performance reversed the trade balance results for March. The combined deficit from the 1st to 17th was US$ 212 million, with imports at US$ 10.101 billion and exports at US$ 9.889 billion.<\/p>\n<p> Year-to-date, the trade balance is running a US$ 5.526 billion deficit, as a result of US$ 46.931 billion in imports and US$ 41.405 billion in exports. The January deficit was US$ 4.036 billion and the February deficit was US$ 1.278 billion. From January until the third week of March last year, the balance of trade had run a US$ 1.127 billion surplus.<\/p>\n<p> According to the Ministry, the trade balance should keep posting deficits up until April because measure taken last year caused imports made by Petrobras to be accounted for at a later date. Due to that, said imports were only included in trade balance calculations starting in late 2012.<\/p>\n<p> <b>*Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brazil\u2019s foreign trade result was negative by US$ 448 million last week, after two weeks in surplus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2315,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[91],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-44246","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-economy"},"wps_subtitle":"Brazil\u2019s foreign trade result was negative by US$ 448 million last week, after two weeks in surplus.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2315"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44246"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44246\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}