{"id":47244,"date":"2014-02-20T14:07:00","date_gmt":"2014-02-20T16:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/escaesco.com.br\/lab\/anba\/brazilian-government-cuts-us-18-bn-off-budget\/"},"modified":"2019-06-30T13:07:49","modified_gmt":"2019-06-30T16:07:49","slug":"brazilian-government-cuts-us-18-bn-off-budget","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/brazilian-government-cuts-us-18-bn-off-budget\/","title":{"rendered":"Brazilian government cuts US$ 18 bn off budget"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bras&iacute;lia &ndash; The Brazilian government has announced this Thursday (20th) that the 2014 Federal Budget cut will amount to R$ 44 billion (US$ 18.3 bn at current exchange rates). With the cut, the government is aiming for a primary surplus equivalent to 1.9% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), in a bid to keep solid macroeconomic foundations and maintain the confidence levels of international investors and the domestic market alike.<\/p>\n<p>The R$ 44 bn cut is higher than 2013&rsquo;s R$ 38 bn (US$ 15.8 bn), but lower than those of 2012 (R$ 55 bn &#8211; US$ 22.9 bn) and 2011 (R$ 50.1 bn &#8211; 20.9 bn). Out of the total cut, R$ 13.5 bn (US$ 5.6 bn) concern mandatory expenditures, and R$ 30.5 bn (US$ 12.7 bn) concern discretionary expenditures. <\/p>\n<p>To Brazil&rsquo;s Finance minister Guido Mantega, the cut has sent a good signal to the domestic and foreign markets, considering the international economic turmoil underway. He said increased optimism from economic players regarding Brazil should ensue after the cuts. <\/p>\n<p>The government&rsquo;s forecasts were based on the following parameters: a primary surplus equivalent to 1.9% of the GDP, equivalent to R$ 99 bn (US$ 41.3 bn); a 5.3% inflation rate, and dollar-to-real ratio of 1 to 2.44. <\/p>\n<p>The Brazilian ministries of Health, Education, Social Development, and Science and Technology were spared from the 2014 Budget cuts. These four areas are regarded as priorities by the government. <\/p>\n<p>The budget forecasts for these four ministries are as follows: slightly above R$ 82.5 bn (US$ 34.3 bn) for Health, R$ 42.2 bn (US$ 17.6 bn) for Education, R$ 31.7 bn (US$ 13.2 bn) for Social Development and R$ 6.8 bn (US$ 2.8 bn) for Science and Technology. All of the amounts are higher than the budget allocations in 2013. <\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The tools we have employed include cutting cost-related spending, increasing investment and maintaining social programs,&rdquo; said Mantega.<\/p>\n<p>Out of the R$ 30.5 bn (US$ 12.7 bn) cut in discretionary expenditures, i.e. those whose allocation the government has autonomy to decide upon, R$ 13.3 bn (US$ 5.5 bn) consist of formerly forecasted expenditures on amendments to the Federal Budget Law. The budget earmarked to amendments has dropped from R$ 19.76 bn (US$ 8.2 bn) to R$ 6.46 bn (US$ 2.6 bn).<\/p>\n<p>The Growth Acceleration Program (PAC, in the Portuguese acronym) saw the second sharpest cut, after amendments: R$ 7 bn (US$ 2.9 bn) &ndash; from R$ 61.46 bn (US$ 25.6 bn) to R$ 54.46 bn (US$ 22.7 bn).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"credits-overlay\" data-target=\".wp-image-182653\">Marcelo Camargo\/Ag\u00eancia Brasil<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Streamlined expenditure forecast and primary surplus target at 1.9% of GDP are designed to maintain sound macroeconomic foundations and market confidence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2315,"featured_media":182653,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[91],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-47244","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-economy"},"wps_subtitle":"Streamlined expenditure forecast and primary surplus target at 1.9% of GDP are designed to maintain sound macroeconomic foundations and market confidence.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2315"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47244\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/182653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anba.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}